Skip to Content

Northern Bobwhite

These small game birds live primarily in the eastern side of the United States and in Central America.

A very popular and economically important game bird of the southeastern U.S., the Northern Bobwhite’s population declines in recent years is cause for concern. Like other quail, it has high mortality rates each year, but a high reproductive output as well. Proper habitat management is crucial to maintain populations of Northern Bobwhite.

Sometimes a female bobwhite will leave her mate on duty to incubate the eggs while she begins a new nest with another male. There are records of Ring-necked Pheasants laying eggs in Northern Bobwhite nests, though it is not considered to be common enough to be a problem for the quail.


Description of the Northern Bobwhite


The Northern Bobwhite varies by subspecies, but is generally patterned in rufous and black, with a bold pale supercilium and a pale throat.

Males have a white supercilium and throat.  Length: 10 in.  Wingspan: 13 in.

‘Masked’ Bobwhite has a black face and very limited range in the S.E. Arizona.


Female quails have a buffy supercilium and throat.

Seasonal change in appearance



Juveniles resemble females, but are browner.


Northern Bobwhites inhabit brushy areas, farms, and overgrown fields.


Northern Bobwhites eat seeds, leaves, and insects.


Northern Bobwhites forage on the ground.


Northern Bobwhites are resident throughout much of the eastern U.S. The population has declined in recent decades.

More information:

Bent Life History

Visit the Bent Life History for extensive additional information on the Northern Bobwhite.

Wing Shape

The shape of a bird’s wing is often an indication of its habits and behavior. Fast flying birds have long, pointed wings. Soaring birds have long, broad wings. Different songbirds will have a slightly different wing shape. Some species look so much alike (Empidonax flycatchers) that scientists sometimes use the length of specific feathers to confirm a species’ identification.

Wing images from the University of Puget Sound, Slater Museum of Natural History

Fun Facts

During winter, Northern Bobwhites form coveys of 10-15 birds, often roosting in a circle at night with each bird facing outward.

Habitat changes and fire ants are reasons given for the bobwhite’s decline.


The song consists of a “bob-white”. A variety of covey calls are given also.


Similar Species

  • Northern Bobwhites are distinctive, with nothing else in their range being likely to confuse birders.Scaled Quail
    The Scaled Quail is the other quail species found in parts of the bobwhite’s range.  It’s scaly chest and crest make it easy to identify.


The Northern Bobwhite’s nest consists of a grass-lined depression on the ground, often concealed by an arch of vegetation.

Number: Usually lay 12-16 eggs.
Color: Whitish.

Incubation and fledging:
The young hatch at about 23-24 days, and leave the nest shortly after hatching,  though associating with the adults for some time.


Bent Life History of the Northern Bobwhite

Published by the Smithsonian Institution between the 1920s and the 1950s, the Bent life history series of monographs provide an often colorful description of the birds of North America. Arthur Cleveland Bent was the lead author for the series. The Bent series is a great resource and often includes quotes from early American Ornithologists, including Audubon, Townsend, Wilson, Sutton and many others.

Bent Life History for the Northern Bobwhite – the common name and sub-species reflect the nomenclature in use at the time the description was written.

[Current A.O.U. = Northern Bobwhite]

In the springtime and early in summer bobwhite deserves his name, which he loudly proclaims in no uncertain terms and in a decidedly cheering tone from some favorite perch on a fence post or the low branch of some small tree. But at other seasons I prefer to call him a quail, the name most familiar to northern sportsmen, or a partridge, as he is even more appropriately called in the South. But European sportsmen would say that neither of these names is strictly accurate, so we may as well call him bobwhite, which is at least distinctive. By whatever name we call him, he is one of our most popular and best beloved birds. From a wide distribution in t.he East, he has followed the plow westward with the clearing of the forests and the cultivation of the fertile lands of the Middle West; and more recently he has been successfully introduced into many far-western States.

Bobwhite is one of the farmer’s best friends: his economic status is wholly beneficial; he is not known to be injurious to any of our crops, as what grain he eats is mostly waste grain, picked up in th~ stubble fields after the crops are harvested. It seems to me, however, that too much stress has been laid on his services as a destroyer of weed seeds. Nature has provided so lavishly in the distribution of weed seeds that only a very small fraction of them can find room to germinate, and the seeds picked up by birds, which never glean thoroughly, only leave room for others to grow. I doubt if even a square foot of ground has ever been kept clear of weeds by birds. The hoe and the cultivator will always have to be used. But bobwhite has a fine score to his credit as a destroyer of grasshoppers, locusts, potato beetles, plant lice, and other injurious insects.

It has been suggested by some bird protectionists that the bobwhite should be removed from the game-bird list and be rigidly protected at all seasons as a song bird and an insectivorous bird. But we must not lose sight of its economic value as a game bird and the pleasure and healthful exercise that it gives to thousands of sportsmen. There are hundreds of other birds that bring joy to the hearts of amateur bird admirers and many others that are nearly or quite as useful as insect destroyers, so why should we deprive the sportsmen of their most popular upland game bird, when they have not more than two or three species at best in any one section of the country? Edward H. Forbush (1927) has summed up the matter very well, as follows:

As a popular game bird of the open country Bob-white has no rivaL Probably about 500,000 sportsmen now go out annually from cities east of the Rocky Mountains to hunt this bird. This necessitates a great annual expenditure for hunters’ clothing, guns, ammunition, dogs, and guides. It adds to the revenue of farmers and country hostelries. In some of the southern states Bob-white pays the taxes on many farms where the farmers sell their shooting rights to sportsmen. Perhaps there is no bird to which the American people are more deeply indebted for both aesthetic and material benefits. He is the most democratic and ubiquitous of all our game birds. He is not a bird of desert, wilderness, or mountain peak which one must go far to find. He seeks the home, farm, garden, and field; he is the friend and companion of mankind; a much needed helper on the farm; a destroyer of insect pests and weeds; a swift flying game bird, lying well to a dog; and, last as well as least, good food, a savory morsel, nutritiotis and digestible.

One does not have to go far afield to find the haunts of bobwhites, for they shun the deep forest areas, seldom resort to the woods except to escape from danger, and are rarely found on the wide open prairies. They seem to love the society of human beings and their cultivated fields. During spring and summer they are particularly domestic and sociable, when it is no uncommon occurrence to hear their loud, ringing calls almost under our windows, to see one perched on a fence post near the house or on the low branch of an apple tree in the orchard, or to find them running along the driveway or a garden path. They are very tame and confiding at that season and seem to know that they are safe. At other seasons they resort to more open country and seek more seclusion. In New England they prefer the vicinity of farms, where they find suitable feeding grounds in old weed patches and stubble fields where crops of buckwheat, millet, rye, wheat, oats, or other grains have been harvested. But near at hand they must have suitable cover, thick, swampy tangles or brier patches in which to roost at night, or dense thickets or woodlots in which to seek refuge when pursued. In the South, according to M. P. Skinner, they “like weedy corners of cornfields next to a tangle of blackberry briars, cane, cat briars, and brush, into which they can retreat at a moment’s notice. They also like cotton fields, especially if a corner be grown up to broom sedge and low brush.” The cultivated fields of the South are usually well overgrown with weeds in the fall, where the partridges find both food and shelter in the old fields of cowpeas, ground nuts, and other crops, overgrown with crabgrass, foxtail grass, Japan clover, plume, and wild grasses.

Courtship: It is not until spring is well advanced that the coveys, which have kept together all winter, begin to break up and scatter. Then it is that the young cock, which has now acquired full maturity and vigor, begins to feel the urge of love and, separating from his companions, sets about the important business of securing a mate. Dressed in his best springtime attire, his bosom swelling with pride, he selects his perch, a fence post, the low branch of a tree, or some convenient stump, from which to send out his love call to his expected bride. Bob-white! Ak, bob-white bob-bob-white! It rings out, loud and clear, repeated at frequent intervals, while he listens for a response, perhaps for half an hour or more in vain. At length he may hear the coveted sound, the sweet, soft call of the demure little hen. With crest erected and eyes aglow, he flies to meet her and display his charms, fluttering and strutting about her and coaxing her with all the pomp and pride of a turkey gobbler. But she is shy and coy, and does not yield at first. Perhaps she runs away, and then ensues a lively game of chase. Aretas A. Saunders tells in his notes of such a chase that he saw under favorable circumstances. The hen kept about 5 feet ahead of the cock, running rapidly, faster than he had seen this species move at any other time, back and forth, in and out, around some clumps of grass. Though he watched for 15 minutes, the cock did not seem to gain an inch. Doubtless he did eventually.

But bobwhite’s road to happiness is not always so smooth. As his clarion call of defiance rings out across the fields an answering call, bob-bob-white, reaches his jealous ears, the voice of an unknown rival. Back and forth the challenges are exchanged, as the brave little warrior advances to meet his foe. Louder, sharper, and angrier are their cries, as they dodge about, bursting with rage and eager for the fray, seeking a vantage point for the attack. At last they clinch in furious combat, like small game cocks, savagely biting and tearing with sharp little beaks, scratching with claws, and buffeting with strong little wings. The fighting is fast and furious for a time until one gives up exhausted and slinks away. Finally the brave little conqueror enjoys the spoils of victory, the acceptance of his suit by the modest little hen, who now knows that she has picked a winner.

Herbert L. Stoddard (1931), in his excellent and exhaustive monograph on the bobwhite, published by the committee on the Cooperative Quail Investigation, has added to our knowledge a vast fund of information on the habits of this valuable, species, its enemies, diseases, and means for preserving a.nd increasing it, based on a five years’ study in cooperation with the Biological Survey. Anyone interested in this subject should study this voluminous report, as our space will permit only brief extracts from it. As to the breaking up of the coveys in the spring, which “are usually composed of the remnants of several hatchings,” he says that “many of the birds are not closely, if at all, related.” At this season, “cocks, which had been peaceable companions previously, became pugnacious,” and frequent fights occurred. In the inclosures the fights were harmless, as a rule, but in the wild “an occasional combat no doubt proves fatal, for two dead cock quail that had been picked up afield were brought to us with the flesh bitten to the bone at the junction of head and neck.”

Referring to the courtship display, he writes:

This display is a frontal one. The head is lowered and frequently turned sideways to show the snow, -white head markings to the best advantage, the wings are extended until the primary tips touch the ground, while ,the elbows are elevated over the back and thrown forward, forming a vertical feathered wall. The bird, otherwise puffed out to the utmost In addition to the spread, forward-thrust wings and lowered, side-turned head, now walks or advances in short rushes toward the hen, and follows her at good speed in full display in case she turns and runs.

Some evidence was obtained to indicate that some mated pairs remain mated during winter and for at least two breeding seasons. As to the devotion of mated pairs, he says:

Two weeks to a month may elapse, depending on the weather, between the time of pairing and the beginning of nesting. During this period the pairs appear Inseparable, the hen usually taking the lead in foraging expeditions, with the cock a devoted follower. He is very attentive at this time, as indeed he is all daring the breeding season, unless he takes up incubation duties, when he appears to lose interest in the opposite sex. It Is amusing to see him catch a grasshopper or other large insect after a lively chase. He puffs himself up and, holding the insect out in a stiff, wooden manner, starts a soft, rapidly repeated ce-cu-cu-ca to attract his mate, who rushes to him and eats the dismembered insect. This common habit may be frequently observed all during the breeding season, the hen usually being the one to get the insects caught by the cock, even when ibe pair are rearing a brood.

Nesting: The bobwhite’s nest is a very simple affair, but artfully concealed and seldom found, except by accident, as the bird is a very close sitter and usually does not leave the nest until almost trodden upon. The favorite nesting sites seem to be along old fence rows, where the grass grows long and thick or is mixed with tangles of vines or briers, in neglected brushy corners of old fields, under discarded piles of brush, or in the tangled underbrush that, mixed with grass, grows on the edges of woods, thickets, or swamps. The nest i~ often placed in open fields of tall grass, where the hay cutter sometimes destroys it, in cultivated fields of grain or alfalfa, or at the base of a tree in the farmer’s orchard, if the grass is long enough to conceal it. A nest is often found in an unexpected place. Once, at my cottage on Cape Cod, I worked for two days weeding my garden within 3 feet of a boundary fence and was surprised the next day, on cutting the grass along the fence, to uncover a quail’s nest, with 15 eggs, from which the bird had never stirred. I was told one day that there was a quail’s nest under a brush pile at our golf club and went up to photograph at. I found a pile of pine boughs that had been cast aside just off the edge of an elevated putting green. I walked around it carefully several times trying to see the bird, but I never found it until I lifted the right bough and flushed her. I saw her several times afterwards and believe she raised her brood successfully.

George Finlay Simmons (1915) tells of a nest found by him in Texas “under the edge of a bale of hay in an old shed on the prairie,” which he discovered by flushing the bird. Charles R. Stockard (1905) writes from Mississippi:

In fields of sedge grass or oats many pairs will often nest very close together. June, 1896, I found in a thirty acre field of sedge grass sixteen nests of the Bob. white, all containing large sets, ranging from twelve to twenty-two eggs, and the total number of eggs in this field must have been about three hundred.

Out of 602 nests, studied by Stoddard (1931) and his associates, 97 were in woodland, 336 in broom-sedge fields, 88 in fallow fields, and “about 4 per cent in cultivated fields, mostly in the grassy growth around stumps in corn or cotton fields, but occasionally under trash cast aside by plows or cultivators.” In the few cases where nest construction was under observation the work was done entirely by the male under the supervision of his mate.

The construction of a typical nest is very simple. Having selected a suitable spot, where the vegetation is thick enough to afford effective concealment, a hollow is “cooped out and lined with dead grass or other convenient material; after that the dead and growing grass or other vegetation is woven into an arch over the nest, often completely concealing it, and leaving only a small opening on the side, just large enough for the bird to enter or leave the nest; while incubating, the bird looks out through this opening; if there are any vines or briers growing about the nest, these are also woven into the arch to make it firmer and more impenetrable. F. W. Rapp describes in his notes a more elaborate nest, resembling a marsh wren’s nest in construction and shape and very firmly built; it was located in a fence row and was made of oak leaves and June grass, neatly woven together into a ball, flattened on the bottom, with a hole on one side. Often the simplest nest is made by entering a thick clump of grass and flattening down a hollow in the center, without disturbing the grass tops at all.

Major Bendire (1892) quotes Judge John N. Clark as having seen a male bobwhite building a nest, as follows:

In May, 1887, while on a hill back of my house one morning, I heard a Quail whistle, but the note, which was continually repeated, had a smothered sound. Tracking the notes to their source, I found a male Bob White building a nest in a little patch of dewberry vines. He was busy carrying in the grasses and weaving a roof, as well as whistling at his work. The dome was very expertly fashioned, and fitted into Its place without changing the surroundings, so that I believe I would never have observed it, hail he kept quiet.

He also speaks of a nest, found in Louisiana, which “was entirely constructed of pine needles, arched over, and the entrance probably a foot or more from the nest proper.”

Eggs: The bobwhite ordinarily lays from 12 to 20 eggs, 14 to 16 being perhaps the commonest numbers; as few as ‘1 or 8 and as many as 30, 82, and even 37 eggs have been found in a nest; but these large numbers are probably the product of more than one female and are deposited in layers. The eggs are mainly subpyriform in shape, sometimes quite pointed or again more rounded. The shell is smooth, with very little gloss, and decidedly hard and tough. The color is dull white or creamy white, rarely “light buff” or “pale ~ They are never spotted, but are usually more or less nest stained. The measurements of 55 eggs in the United States National Museum average 30 by 24 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure 32.5 by 24, 31 by 26, and 28 by 22.5 millimeters.

Bobwhites occasionally lay their eggs in other birds’ nests. H. J. Giddings (1897) reports the finding of a quail’s egg in a towhee’s nest; and the editor in a footnote refers to one laying in a domestic turkey’s nest. E. B. Payne (1897) adds that he “found in a meadowlark’s nest five of the meadowlark’s eggs and four of the quail’s.” Mr. Rapp mentions in his notes a quail’s nest shown to him that contained 12 eggs of the quail and 2 of the domestic hen. Herbert L. Stoddard has a photograph of a bantam’s egg in a quail’s nest.

Young: It is generally supposed that at least two broods of young are raised in a season, perhaps three in the southern part of the quail’s range, as very early and very late broods are of common occurrence. But, as the quail has many enemies and many nests are broken up or deserted, it may be that the late broods are merely belated attempts to raise a family; in which case, perhaps one brood in the North and two in the South is more nearly the average.

Most authorities agree that the period of incubation is about 23 or 24 days. Both sexes share this duty. in the study of 276 nests by Mr. Stoddard (1931), in southern Georgia and northern Florida, so far as could be ascertained 73 were entirely in charge of the cock and 1’l5 in charge of the hen. If any fatal accident befall the hen, as too often happens, then the cock assumes full charge of the eggs and afterwards takes care of the young. It is said, too, that after the young are two or three weeks old the mother hands the brood over to the care of their father and starts to lay a second set of eggs; but I doubt if this has been definitely proved.

Young quail leave the nest almost as soon as they are hatched, and the eggshells are generally left in the nest, although occasionally a chick is seen running away with part of the shell on its back. They are carefully tended by their devoted parents, who use every known artifice to distract an enemy. Dr. T. M. Brewer (Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway, 1905) relates the following to illustrate an extreme case of parental boldness:

Once as I was rapidly descending a path on the side of a bill, among a low growth of scrub-oak I came suddenly upon a covey of young Quail, feeding on blueberries, and directly in the path. They did not see me until I was close upon them, when the old bird, a fine old male, flew directly towards me and tumbled at my feet as if in a dying condition, giving at the same time a shrill whistle, expressive of intense alarm. I stooped and put my hand upon his extended wings, and could easily have caught him. The young birds, at the cry of the parent, flew in all directions; and their devoted father soon fol. lowed them, and began calling to them in a low cluck, like the cry of the Brown Thresher. The young at this time were hardly more than a week old, and seemed to fly perfectly well to a short distance.

Their ability to fly at such an early age is due to the fact that their wings begin to sprout almost as soon as they are hatched; I have seen young chicks not more than 2 inches long with wings reaching to their tails; they are very active and vigorous and grow very rapidly. They are experts at hiding; a warning note from the watchful parent, who previously has kept the brood together by frequent gentle twitterings, sends them to cover instantly; instinctively they dart under some fallen leaf, beneath a tuft of grass, into some thick vegetation or little hollow, where they remain motionless until told by their parent that danger has passed. Edwyri Sandys (1904) has described this so well that I quote the following:

If those who may stumble upon a brood of quail will take a sportsmannaturalist’s advice, they will promptly hack away for a few yards, sit down, and remain silently watchful. No search should he attempted, for the searcher is nrnre likely to trample the life out of the youngsters than to catch one. But If he hide In patience, he may see the old hen return, mark her cautiously stealing to the spot, and hear her low musical twitter which tells that the peril has passed. Then from the scant tuft here, from the drooping leaf yonder, apparently from the bare ground over which his eyes have roved a dozen times, will arise active halls of pretty down until the spot appears to swarm with them. And the devoted mother will whisper soft greetings to each, and in some mysterious manner will make the correct count, and then with nervous care shepherd them forward to where there is safer cover. And they will troop after her in perfect confidence, to resume their bug-hunting and botanical researches as though nothing Important had transpired.

Young quail are busy foragers, and they grow rapidly. Within a few days after leaving the nest they are capable of a flight of several yards. A brood flushed by a dog will buzz up like so many overgrown grasshoppers, fly a short distance, then dive into cover in a comical imitai:Ion of the tactics of their seniors. As insect catchers they are unrivalled, their keen eyes and tireless little legs being a most efficient equipment even for a sustained chase. The parents scratch for them and call them to some dainty after the manner of bantam fowls, and the shrewd chicks speedily grasp the idea and set to work for themselves. A tiny quail scratching in a dusty spot is a most amusing sight. The wee legs twinkle through the various movements at a rate which the eye can scarcely follow, and the sturdy feet kick the dust for inches around. When a prey is uncovered it is pounced upon with amazing speed and accuracy, while a flying insect may call forth an electric leap and a clean catch a foot or more above the ground. As the season advances grain, seeds of various weeds, berries, wild grapes, and mast are added to the menu, in which insects still remain prominent. After the wheat has been cut the broad stubbles become favorite resorts, especially when they are crowded with ragweed. Patches of standing corn now furnish attractive shelter and the suitable dusting places so necessary to gallinaceous birds.

Plumages: Only in the smallest chicks can the pure natal down be seen. In a typical chick the forehead and sides of the head are from “ochraceous-tawny” to “ochraceous-buff,” with a stripe of brownish black from the eye to the nape; a broad band from the hind neck to the crown, terminating in a point above the forehead, is “chestnut,” deepening to “bay” on the edges; there is a similar broad band of the same colors from the upper back to the rump; the rest of the upper parts is mottled ‘vith “chestnut,” dusky, and buff; the chin and lower parts are pale buff or buffy white. In some specimens from the South the back and rump are almost wholly “chestnut.” mixed with some black.

The juvenal plumage begins to appear on the wings and scapulars at a very early age, even before the chick has increased perceptibly in size; I have seen chicks 2 or 3 inches long that had wings extending beyond the tail and that would soon be able to fly. In this plumage the sexer are alike, except that, according to Dr. Jonathan Dwight (1900), “the males are apt to be richer colored than are females, with grayer tails, whiter chins, blacker throat bands, and often a slight dusky barring on the breast.” The first feathers to appear on the back and scapulars are black on the inner web, broadly tipped with white, and mottled with brown (” russet “to “tawny”) and dusky on the outer web, with white shaft stripes, broadening at the tip; as these feathers grow out longer the black appears only as a large subterminal spot. In full juvenal plumage the crown is centrally dusky, laterally gray (” hair brown” to “drab”), mottled or variegated with black; the throat is white in the male and buffy white in the female; the breast and flanks are ” drab” to “light drab,” with whitish shaft streaks; the belly is paler or white; the tail is gray, mottled with white; and the primaries are mottled with pale buff on the edges.

Even before the juvenal plumage is fully acquired the postjuvenal molt into the first winter plumage begins. This molt is complete except for the outer pair of primaries on each wing, which are retained all through the first year; and it takes place at any time from late in summer until November, depending on the time at which the young were hatched. The first winter plumage is scarcely distinguishable from that of the adult, and the sexes are widely differentiated; but the colors above are duller with paler edgings, and the underparts are more buffy and somewhat less barred. Young birds can be distinguished from adults all through the first winter and spring by the outer pair of primaries, the first and second, on each wing, which are still juvenal (pointed).

The first prenuptial molt, as well as all subsequent prenuptial molts, amounts to the renewal of only a few feathers about the head and throat. The first postnuptial molt, the following summer and fall, chiefly in September, is complete and produces the adult winter plumage. Adults then continue to have similar molts each year, a very limited head molt in spring and a complete postnuptial molt from August to October. The slight seasonal difference between spring and fall plumages is mainly due to wear and fading.

Among the thousands of quail shot and the large series preserved in collections, some odd types of plumage are to be found, such as males with black or buff throats, very dark or melanistic types, others in which the browns are replaced with buff or the buffs with white, producing a pallid type; partial albinos are occasionally seen and very rarely one that is wholly pure white. Erythrism is reported and illustrated by Stoddard (1931).

Food: Quail are very regular in their feeding habits. Every sportsman knows this and takes advantage of it, for he knows when and where to look for them. They do not leave their roosting place early in the morning, as they prefer to wait until the rising sun very has, at least partially, dried the dew off the grass; in winter or late in fall, when every blade of grass, twig, or spray of vegetation is white with hoarfrost, and when the feeble rays of the sun are late in rising, they are slow to venture out. But usually by an hour after sunrise they are afoot toward some convenient weed patch, stubble field, berry patch, or cultivated field. Here they feed for an hour or two, filling their crops, and then retire to some sheltered spot for a midday siesta, digesting their food, dusting or preening their plumage, or merely basking in the sun or dozing. About two hours before sunset they return to their feeding grounds again for another feast before going to roost at dusk.

The food of the bobwhite has been exhaustively studied, and a mass of material has been published on it. Space will not permit any detailed account of it here; I can give only a general idea of it. The most complete account of it that I have seen is given by Sylvester D. Judd (1905) of the Biological Survey, to which the reader is referred. He says that the bobwhite is “one of our most nearly omnivorous species. In addition to seeds, fruit., leaves, buds, tubers, and insects, it has been known to eat spiders, myriapod~, crustaceans, mollusks, and even batrachians.” In analysis of 918 stomachs, collected during every month in the year, in 21 States and in Canada, the food for the year as a whole consisted of vegetable matter, 83.59 per cent, and animal matter, 16.41 per ceni;, mixed with some sand and gravel. Of the vegetable food, grain constituted 17.88 per cent, seed 52.83 per cent and fruit 9.57 per cent; the grain was probably mostly waste kernels, and the seeds were mainly weed seeds; not a single kernel of sprouting grain was found in any of the crops or stomachs; and there is no evidence that quail ever do any damage to standing crops. The fruits eaten were practically all wild fruits. The animal matter was distributed among beetles, 6.92 per cent; grasshoppers, 3.71 per cent; bugs, 2.77 per cent; caterpillars, 0.95 per cent; and other things, 2.06 per cent. From October to March the food is almost entirely vegetable matter, but late in spring and in summer it is made up largely of insects, August showing 44.1 per cent of insect food. The insects eaten are mostly injurious species, many of which are avoided by other insectivorous birds, such as “the potato beetle, twelve-spotted cucumber beetle, striped cucumber beetle, squash lady-bird beetle, various cutworms, the tobacco worm, army worm, cotton worm, cotton bollworm, the clover weevil, cotton boll weevil, imbricated snout beetle, May beetle, click beetle, the redlegged grasshopper, Rocky Mountain locust, and chinch bug.”

Since the above was written, the author has seen Stoddard’s (1931) much more elaborate account of the food and feeding habits of quail in the Southeastern States, contributed by C. 0. Handley. Doctor Judd’s report covered a wider territory, and the stomachs were obtained for each month of the year, but most of them were taken late in fall and in winter, and there were no stomachs of young birds examined. Mr. Handley’s report is based on the examination of the food of 1,625 adult and 42 young bobwhites; it covers 53 pages and is far too voluminous and too elaborate for me even to attempt to quote from it. It should be carefully studied. A condensed table gives the monthly and yearly percentages of the various items in the food. The total yearly averages show 85.59 per cent of vegetable and 14.41 per cent of animal food. The principal items in the vegetable food are: Fruits, 19.41; legumes, 15.17; mast, 13.42; grass seeds, 10.65; and miscellaneous seeds, 10.24 per cent; and in the animal food: Orthoptera, 7.43; Coleoptera, 2.98; Hemiptera, 1.96; and other insects, 1.06 per cent. For all the interesting details the reader is referred to this exhaustive report.

E. L. Moseley (1928) gives a striking illustration of the value of bobwhites as destroyers of potato beetles in Ohio, where these birds have increased enormously under 10 years of rigid protection. He says:

For several years past potatoes have been raised successfully on many farms in Ohio without spraying for beetles, or taking any measures to combat the insects. In fact many patches have been practically free from the “bugs.” Bob-whites have been observed to spend much of the time among the potato vines. They have been seen to follow a row, picking off the potato beetles. When the potato patch was located near woodland there was no trouble with the beetles; but when the patch was near the highway or buildings, even on the same farm, the insects were troublesome. On farms where the Bob White found nesting sites and protection, the potato vines, if not too near the buildings, were kept free from the insects. A patch of potatoes surrounded by open fields, without bushes, tall weeds, or crops that might shelter the Bob White, was likely to be infested with beetles. A farmer living eight miles south of Defiance raised about fifty Bob Whites on his place. During the two years that these birds were there he had no trouble with insects on either potatoes or cabbage. The following autumn a number of the birds were killed by hunters, while others were frightened away. The next summer the potato beetles were back in numbers. The farmer is again raising Bob Whites and protecting them from hunters.

Mrs. Margaret M. Nice (1910) found that a captive bobwhite ate 568 mosquitoes in two hours, another 5,000 plant lice in a day, and another 1,000 grasshoppers and 532 other insects in a day; also that it ate from 600 to 30,000 weed seeds each day, according to the size of the seeds and the bird’s capacity. I can not give here a complete list of the food of the bobwhite, as given by Doctor Judd (1905), but a few of the most important seeds are those of various grasses, rushes, sedges, sorrel, smartweed, bindweed, chickweed, lupine, clover, vetches, spurges, maples, ashes, oaks, pines, violets, morning-glory, ragweed, sunflower, beggarticks, and foxtail and witch grass. Among the fruits are waxmyrtle, barberry, bayberry, mulberry, thimble berries, blackberries, wild strawberries, rose hips, wild apples, cherries, poison ivy, sumacs, holly, black alder, bittersweet, frost grapes, blueberries, huckleberries, elderberries, viburnums, honeysuckle, partridgeberry, and woodbine. Wherever the foregoing plants are cultivated or allowed to grow in profusion, bobwhites will find abundant food all through the year and will be encouraged to remain, with profit to the farmer and joy to the sportsman.

The more important items of insect food have been mentioned above. From 35 to 46 per cent of the summer food of adults consists of insects, but the young chicks eat a much larger proportion of this food. Small beetles of various kinds, weevils, small grasshoppers, caterpillars, ants, stink bugs, spiders, and thousand legs have been identified in the food of small chicks.

Behavior: When a flock of quail suddenly bursts into the air from almost underfoot the effect is startling and gives the impression of great strength and speed. They have been referred to as feathered bombshells. Such sudden flights of a whole bevy in unison are due to the fact that they have crouched, trusting to their wonderful powers of concealment, until the very last moment, when they are forced to make a quick get-away. From their crouching attitude they are in position to make a strong spring into the air, giving them a good start, which their short but powerful wings continue in a burst of speed. Such bombshell flights are the rule when the birds are feeding in close formation, or when suddenly disturbed in their roosting circles. At other times their flight is much less startling but often quite as swift. I have often seen a single quail, or a pair or two, rise and fly away as softly and as silently as any other bird, when not alarmed. Their flight is not long protracted and generally ends by scaling down on set wings into the nearest cover. In settling, a flock usually scatters, to be joined together later by the gather call. Often single birds and sometimes a whole flock will aliglit in a tree, if alarmed. When leaving the tree their flight is silent and usually scaling downward. That they are not capable of long flights is shown by the fact that they become very much exhausted in flying across wide rivers and have even been known to drop into the water in attempting such flights.

Stoddard (1931) made a number of tests to determine the speed of bobwhites in flight. “These showed a speed for mature birds ranging from 28 to 38 miles an hour. It seems fair to estimate that the sportsman’s hurtling mark sometimes exceeds 40 miles an hour, and birds just ahead of ‘blue darters’ are believed to go even faster for short distances.”

Quail do much of their traveling on foot, and they are great travelers. They cover considerable ground in a day’s routine, and a bevy may be found in any one of several feeding places. In some sections they are said to make seasonal migrations from one type of country to another, the journeys being made largely on foot. It is no uncommon occurrence to see a pair in spring, or a flock in fall, running along or across a country road. They make a very smart and trim appearance, with bodies held erect and heads held high, as they run swiftly along on their strong little legs. If too hard pressed they rise, flit gently over a fence or wall, and disappear. One can not help admiring their graceful carriage and their efficiency as runners. T believe they prefer to escape from their enemies by running, until too hard pressed; a bird dog will often trail a running bevy for a long distance.

Their characteristic method of roosting in a close circle, with bodies closely packed and heads facing out, is well known. For this they select some sheltered spot under an evergreen tree or thick bush, or in some dense tangle of briers or underbrush. Sometimes they select a small island in a river or a pond for a roosting place. If not disturbed they will occupy the same spot for many nights in succession, as evidenced by ~n increasing circle of droppings. Miss Althea R. Sherman told me that she had seen young quail, on the day they were hatched, assume the circular arrangement of a roosting covey, heads outward and tails in the center of the circle. An interesting account of how this circle is formed is given by Dr. Lynds Jones (1903) based on an observation by Robert J. Sim under especially favorable circumstances:

First one stepped around over the spot selected, then another Joined him, the two standing pressed close together, forming the first arc of the circle. Another and another joined themselves to this nucleus, always with heads pointing out, tails touching, until the circle was complete. But two were left out! One stepped up to the group, made an opening, then crowded himself In, with much ruffling of feathers. Ono remained outside, with no room anywhere to get In. He, too, ran up to the circle of heads, then round and round, trying here and there in vain; it was a solid mass. Nothing daunted, he nimbly jumped upon the line of hacks pressed Into a nearly smooth surface, felt here and there for a yielding spot, began wedging himself between two brothers, slipped lower and lower, and finally hecame one of the bristling heads. In this defensive body against frost and living enemy we may leave them.

But quail do not always roost on the ground. Mr. Sandys (1904) says that It is no uncommon thing to find them regularly roosting In such places as a mass of wild grape vines attached to a fence or a tree, in some thick, bushy tree, in an apple tree near the poultry, sometimes in the fowl-house, barn, or stable, on the lower rails of a weedy fence, on top of logs, and occasionally on the bare rails of a fence.

The ability of quail to hide and escape detection under the most scanty protection is truly remarkable. One is often surprised to see a bird or a whole covey arise from a spot that seems to offer no chance for concealment. Their ability to withhold their scent under such circumstances will be referred to later. Mr. ForbuTh (1927) relates some interesting observations on a bobwhite that spent a winter in his yard and became quite tame. He escaped the notice of a wandering dog by squatting on bare ground. A slow, quiet settling of his whole body was followed by the widening of the shoulders and an indrawing of the head, and, shaking out his feathers, he squatted on the snowy ground “as flat as a pancake.” The white markings of the throat and head were cunningly concealed, the top of the head projecting barely enough beyond the general outline to allow him a comprehensive view of his surroundings. Once he effaced himself from sight in a little hollow at the foot of a tree, where he was invisible even through a glass at 40 feet away, until he “grew” out of the ground and walked away. Again he faded from view in a cleft in a stump less than 3 inches deep. Where there are dry leaves or grass concealment is easy.

Voice: The most characteristic and best-known note of the bobwhite is the spring call, or challenge note, of the male, from which its name is derived. It is heard all through the breeding season in summer. It is subject to considerable individual variation and has been variously interpreted as bob-white, mare-wet, no-more-wet, peasmost-ripe, buck-wheat-ripe, wha-whoi, so-to-more-wheat, and others. This call is subject to considerable variation; the number of the preliminary bobs varies from one to two or rarely three; sometime these first syllables are entirely omitted and we hear only the loud white, which again may he shortened to ‘whit. Aretas A. Saunders, who has made a study of the voice of the bobwhite, has sent me some elaborate notes on it. He says that the pitch in this call, counting all his records, varies from G” to F” ‘, one tone less than an octave. One 3-note call covered this whole range, but the 2-note calls generally begin on A”, most commonly have the white note begin a tone higher, and slur up a single tone or a minor third. Sometimes the second note gives more accent and time to the first part of the slur, and somctimes the lower note of the slur is on the same pitch as the first note. The least range of pitch is shown in a 2-note call beginning on C, starting the slur on C~, and ending on D. What he calls the slur comes, of course, in the last, or white, note.

The bobwhite note is almost invariably given while the bird is standing on some favorite perch, but R. Bruce Horsfall writes to me that while visiting in Virginia, on August 2, he saw a male bobwhite fly across an old orchard, with few remaining trees but much uncut grass, uttering this note in flight, fully a dozen calls in rapid succession, ceasing only with the termination of the flight.

Although many writers refer to the “bobwhite” note as the call of the cock bird to his sitting mate, Stoddard (1931) says: We respectfully express our belief, based upon all the data we have been able to obtain personally, that the “bobwhite” call note is largely the call of the unmated cocks; ardent fellows eager to mate, but doomed to a summer of loneliness, from lack of physical prowess or an insufficient number of hens to go around.

The sweetest and loveliest call, entirely different from the foregoing or the following, is the 4-syllable whistle of the female, used to answer the male in spring and to call the young later in the season. My father, who was an expert whistler as well as a keen sportsman, could imitate this note to perfection. He often amused himself, when bobwhites were whistling in spring, by concealing himself in some thick brush and answering the bobwhite call of the male with this enticing note. It was amusing to see the effect on the cock bird, as he came nearer at each repetition of the answer to his call, looking in vain for his expected mate, and sometimes coming within 20 feet before detecting the deception. Once two cocks came to look for the anticipated hen; then a lively fight ensued, all on account of an imaginary bride. This call consists of four notes, the first and third short, soft, and on a low key, and the second and fourth longer, louder, richer, and on a much higher key. I have seen it written jo-/wi-a-chin, or whoooeee-che, but to me it sounds more like a-loie-a-hee. It is a beautiful, soft, rich note, with a decided emphasis on the second syllable, of a liquid quality with no harsh sounds.

The third whistling note is the well-known gather call, so often heard during the fall when the flock has become scattered and the birds are trying to get together again, particularly toward night when they are gathering to go to roost. It has also been called the scatter call. It is a loud, emphatic whistle of two parts, slurred together, with an emphasis on the first. It has a human quality and to my mind is much like the whistle that I use to call my dog. It sounds to me like quci-hee. To Mr. Sandys (1904) It sounds very like ica: lol-hee, lca4oi-hee, especially when the old hen is doing the calling. There are many variations of it, too, who fl-keg representing a common one. It is an open question if the cock utters this call, although some accomplished sportsmen have claimed that he does. I he writer has been a close observer of quail and would think nothing of calling young birds almost to his feet, yet he has never been able to trace this call to the old male; that is, as a rallying call to the brood. He Is well aware that young males use It in replying to the moiher, but he has yet to see a male of more than one season utter it.

Mr. Saunders has three records of this call, which he describes iii his notes as a “repeated, slurred whistle, with usually an 1-like sound between the notes, so it sounds like coolee.” His records show ranges in pitch from M to C”‘, or from Bb to D4$.

In addition to these three very distinct and striking calls, there is often heard a subdued, conversational chatter while the birds are running and feeding. Doctor Judd (1905) heard, as a part of the courtship performance, “a series of queer responsive ‘caterwalings,’ more unbirdlike than those of the yellow-breasted chat, suggesting now the call of a cat to its kittens, now the scolding of a caged gray squirrel, now the alarm notes of a mother grouse, blended with the strident cry of the guinea hen. As a finale sometimes came a loud rasping noise, not unlike the effort of a broken-voiced whip-poor-will.”

Sandys (1904) says:

A winged bird running, or an uninjured one running from under brush, preparatory to taking wing, frequently voices a musical tkk-tick-tick-a-voy. A bird closely chased by a hawk e,nits a sharp cackling, expressive of extreme tenor. Quite frequently n bevy just before taking wing passes round a low, purring note: presumably a warning to spring all together. When the hen is calling to scattered young, she sometimes varies the cry to an abrupt Ku-leap, after which she remains silent for some time. This the writer believes to he a hint to the young to cease calling: that the danger still threatens, and is prompted by her catching a glimpse of dog or man. A bevy travelling afoot keeps up what may be termed a twittering conversation, and there is a low alarm note, like a whispered imitation of the cry of a hen when a hawk appears.

Stoddard (1931) describes the above-mentioned notes more elaborately, with slightly different interpretations. He also describes several others. The crowing or caterwauling note, a rasping call that varies considerably, is uttered habitually by the cocks at all seasons. He mentions several variations of the scatter call, used to bring together scattered birds or as a morning awakening call, and says:

One of the most interesting features of the “scatter” call and its variations Is that it evolves by imperceptible degrees from the shrill, piping “lost call” of the baby chicks. This starts out with the newly hatched chicks as an anxious piping hu-liu-hu-hu-wlze-whc-whc-wjbce-wheee with rising inflection like do-re-mi of the musical scale.

Of the decoy ruse call, he writes:

One of the strangest calls of bobwhites, and a very important one from the standpoint of theIr preservatIon, is the fine cheeping p-s-i-c-u, p-s-I-c-u, p-s-i-c-is call, uttered by adults and their baby chicks in unison as the brood is stumbled upon by man or beast. This note, proceeding alike from both the frantic parents as they beat about in the dust trying to lure the enemy away, and by the fleeing chicks as they scatter and hide, proves most confusing to the senses, and Is a real quail “sleight of hand” that is apt to leave the confused dIsturber in such a frame of mind that he questions whether he saw fleeing chicks, or whether it was all just a trick of the eye. Deciding it was the latter, most enemies pursue the seemingly wounded parents, which sail away on perfect wing after the enemy has been decoyed from the vicinity of the brood. Thousands of chicks must be saved yearly by this cleverly executed ruse, in which parents and chicks display perfect teamwork, even before the latter are a day old.

The alarm note is started “as soon as the chicks have scattered and hidden or the parents have failed to decoy an intruder away. It consists of a monotonous t-o-i-l: —ick, ick, ick, ick; t-.o-i-l-: -ick, ick, ick, t-o-i-l-i-c, t-o-i-~-i-c, t-u-e-l-i-c-lc; or t-o-i-l-i-c, ip, ip, ip, tic, tic, tw, t-u-e-t-i-c, t-u-e-l-i-c, ick, ip, etc., uttered with machinelike regularity for a time, or as long as danger appears to be imminent.”

He also mentions a distress call, a” piteous whistled c-i-e-u, c-i-c-u, uttered loudly and as rapidly as the mouth can open and close,” given as old or young birds are captured; also a “cheeping” or cackling call of the developing chick, referred to as the “flicker call.” Then there is the ” battle cry,” of the unmated cocks, a harsh, screaming note, uttered in flight; the food call, “a soft, clucking Cu, cu, cu, cu, and a variety of soft conversational notes.”

Fall: When fall comes the bobwhite becomes a quail. Its habits change entirely, as it forsakes the haunts of man and becomes a wild bird. It is no longer a sociable and trusting friend of human beings, so it resorts to the fields and woods, where it can find shelter in the brushy tangles. It travels now in coveys made up of family parties or in larger flocks of more than one family.

Quail are not supposed to be migratory, in the usual sense of the word, and in many sections, New England, for instance, I believe that they are practically sedentary throughout the year. In some sections, however, they seem to perform short migrations to better feeding grounds, or perhaps to escape adverse winter conditions. Audubon (1840) writes:

This species performs occasional migrations from the north-west to the southeast, usually in the beginning of October, and somewhat in the manner of the Wild Turkey. For a few weeks at this season, the north-western shores of the Ohio are covered with flocks of Partridges. They ramble through the woods along the margin of the stream, and generally fly across towards evening. Like the Turkeys, many of the weaker. Partridges often fall into the water, while thus attempting to cross, and generally perish; for although they swim surprisingly, they have not muscular power sufficient to keep up a protracted struggle, although, when they have fallen within a few yards of the shore, they easily escape being drowned. As soon as the Partridges have crossed the princIpal streams in their way, they disperse in flocks over the country, and return to their ordInary mode of life.

This habit is also mentioned by Amos W. Butler (1898), who says that in Indiana they desert the uplands in fall and congregate in large numbers in the Ohio River bottoms; many attempt to cross the river into Kentucky; some perish in the attempt and others reach the farther shore in an exhausted condition. H. D. Minot (1877) says:

In Delaware and Maryland, however, coveys of Quail often appear, who are distinctively called by the sportsmen there “runners.” On the western side of the Chesapeake, an old sportsman assured me that covey after covey passed through the country, where food and shelter were abundant, crossing the peninsula on foot, hut often perishing by the wholesale in attempting to pass the wider inlets, and he added in proof of this that he had taken as many as forty at a time from the middle of the river near his house.

But everywhere quail become very restless in fall and are much given to erratic wandering from no apparent cause. They, are less crazy in this respect than ruffed grouse; I have never known them to fly against buildings and be killed; but I have frequently seen them in my yard and garden in the center of the city. Mr. Butler (1898) says that “they are found in trees and among the shrubbery in gardens, in outbuildings, and among lumber piles. I have seen them in the cellar window-boxes and over the transoms of the front doors of the houses.” These wanderings may be due to a latent migratory instinct.

Game: Everything taken into consideration, the quail, partridge, or bobwhite is undoubtedly the most universally popular of all North American game birds, in spite of the fact that many sportsmen consider the ruffed grouse the prince of game birds. The sophisticated grouse may be the more difficult bird to bag, but the quail, with its southern subspecies, has a much wider distribution, nearer to the haunts of man, is generally more numerous and more prolific, lies better to the dog, flies swiftly enough to make good marksmanship necessary, and is an equally delicious morsel for the table.

One who has never tried it can hardly appreciate the joy and the thrills of a day in the field, with a congenial companion and a brace of well-trained bird dogs, in pursuit of this wonderful game bird. The keen, sparkling October air and the vigorous exercise stimulate both body and mind. The tired business man breathes more freely as he starts out from the old farmhouse across the fields for his holiday with the birds. On a frosty morning, when the grass and herbage are sparkling white with hoarfrost, it is well not to start too early, as quail are not early risers and do not like to get their feet and plumage wet. But when the sun is well up it is time to look for them, for they may be traveling along some brushy old fence teward their favorite buckwheat stubble, one of the best places to find them. When you reach the field where the birds are expected to be found, the most interesting part of the sport begins; the intelligent dogs have learned to quarter t.he ground thoroughly and hunt in every likely spot where their bird sense leads them; excitement becomes intense, as they show by their careful movements that they have scented game; and, finally, the sudden stop and the rigid pose, with nose pointed toward the birds, bring the climax, as the sportsmen step up and the covey bursts into the air with a whir of wings. A good shot may bag two or even three birds on the first rise; I have seen men that boasted of stopping as many as five with an automatic repeater, but I have never seen one do it; and I have seen many clean misses. The rest of the covey have flown straight to the nearest cover, perhaps scattered in several directions, some into a patch of scrub oaks on a hill~ide, some into the tangled underbrush in a swampy hollow, and others into the nearest woodlot. The men should mark them down, but had better leave them for a while until they begin to run about and leave a little scent; otherwise they will be very hard to find. Picking up these scattered singles is hard enough at best; it requires good work on the part of the dogs and gives the hunter many difficult shots in unexpected places. The man that can put two quail in his pocket for every four shells fired is a good shot.

Perhaps the birds have not been found in the buckwheat stubble. Each covey has several feeding places and it is necessary to cover considerable ground, hunting the wheat, rye, oat, and corn stubbles, especially if overgrown with ragweed or other weeds, as well as any other old neglected fields and weed patches where the birds can find food and shelter. Sometimes the dogs will show signs of game in a likely spot but fail to find the birds; quail often make short flights from one field to another, thus breaking the scent. Sometimes a flushed covey will be marked down very carefully in a fairly open field and be immediately followed up; but a careful search by experienced men and good dogs will fail to reveal the presence of a single bird. This has caused much controversy as to the power of quail to withhold their scent. The explanation probably is that the rapid passage throughthe air dissipates most of the scent from the plumage; the birds, being frightened, crouch low on the ground with feathers closely pressed against the body, shutting in body odors; and as they have not run any there is no foot scent. It has often happened that, in a later search over the same ground, after the birds have begun to run about, they have been readily found. There has been no willful or even conscious withholding of scent.

For about four hours during the middle of the day, quail retire from their feeding grounds for their noonday rest. The hunters may as well do likewise, until the birds come out to feed again about two hours before sunset. The hours of waning daylight often furnish some of the best and most interesting shooting; the scattered covey is anxious to get together before roosting time; and the hunters get the final thrills of the day as they hear the sweet, gentle gather call, quoi-hee, quol-kee, from a distant patch of scrub oaks, an answering call from the brier patch in the swale, and another from the edge of the near-by woods. They are content to call it a day and leave the gentle birds to settle down for the night.

Enemies: Quail have numerous enemies, furred, feathered, and scaled, but fortunately they are such persistent and prolific breeders that they can stand the strain from natural enemies if man will give them half a chance.

Stray cats, or domestic cats run wild, are doubtless the most destructive enemies of quail. They catch and devour enormous numbers of both young and old birds, as they hunt them day and night. Mr. Forbush (1927) gives some striking illustrations of this and speaks of one big cat that is said to have killed more than 200 bobwhites. Dogs that are allowed to run loose and hunt independently kill a great many old and young birds. Stray cats in the woods and fields should be shot on sight. Domestic cats and dogs should be restrained during the nesting season.

In Jamaica the mongoose is said to have virtually exterminated the introduced quail. Foxes, minks, and weasels kill some birds, but they probably find rabbits easier to catch and more to their liking. Raccoons, opossums, skunks, and rats destroy a great many eggs.

Among bird enemies the crow is one of the worst. Crows are very clever in hunting up nests and destroy a great many eggs; they have even been known to kill the adult birds in winter. Crows, in my opinion, should be shot whenever possible, for they can not be much reduced at best. Cooper’s hawk is probably the worst of the hawks. The goshawk and the sharp-shinned hawk are almost as bad. Red-tailed hawks have been known to kill quail, but they are too slow to catch very many, and they are useful as rodent destroyers. Great horned and other owls must be reckoned with, but the former is very fond of skunks, and all the owls keep the destructive rodents in check. Quail have learned that brier patches and thick tangles offer good protection against their enemies in the air.

Any of the larger snakes will eat the eggs and probably destroy a great many, but here again we must give them credit for living largely on the rodent enemies of the bobwhite. Major Bendire (1892) speaks of a large rattlesnake, killed in Texas, that had swallowed five adult quail at one meal, and another that had taken four bobwhites and a scaled quail.

In his chapter on mortality, Stoddard (1931) states that of 602 nests studied about “36 per cent were more or less successful and about 64 per cent unsuccessful.” The failures were due to nest desertion, destruction by natural enemies, destruction by the elements, rains, floods, or droughts, and disturbance by human beings, by farm work, or by poultry and cattle. Among the destroyers of eggs hB mentions, in addition to the enemies named above, blue jays, turkeys, and red ants; the ants enter the egg as soon as the membrane is punctured by the emerging chick, which is literally eaten alive; out of 278 nests studied by Louis Campbell in 1928, 34 were taken over by ants.

After hatching, young quail are preyed upon by most of the more active enemies named above, to which must be added turkeys, guinea fowl, pheasants, and shrikes. The chief winged enemies of the older young and adults are Cooper’s and sharp-shinned hawks, and in the North the goshawk. The Buteos are mainly, or wholly, beneficial. Mr. Stoddard (1931) exempts the sparrow hawk from blame and says: “In several instances individuals took up quarters temporarily on the fence posts of propagating enclosures and made forays against the large grasshoppers on the ground beneath, without harming the quail chicks in the least.” In favor of the marsh hawk, he writes:

In view of the fact that not more than 4 quail were discovered in approximately 1,100 pellets, marsh hawks can hardly be accused of making any serious Inroads on the number of quail in the region. On the other hand, one or more cotton rats were found in 925 of these peUets. Since cotton rats destroy the eggs of quail, the marsh hawk is probably the best benefactor the quail has in the area, for it is actively engaged in reducing the numbers of these rodents. Remains of at least 14 snakes, most of which were colubrines, were discovered. These also are probably eaters of quail eggs.

Diseases: The chapters on parasites and diseases, in Stoddard’s (1931) report, were contributed by Dr. Eloise B. Cram, Myrna F. Jones, and Ena A. Allen, of the Bureau of Animal Industry. They are well worth careful study, but are too long (110 pages) and too technical for any adequate presentation here. Suffice it to say that bobwhites are attacked by many of the same parasites and suffer from many of the same diseases as ruffed grouse. Among the Protozoa the most important are those which cause malaria, coccidiosis, and blackhead. Nematodes, or roundworms, were found “in a high percentage of the birds examined “; 16 species were identified, and their life histories explained. In the intestines five species of tapeworms were found and similarly described. As external parasites, lice, ticks, mites, and fleas are mentioned. Among the nonparasitic diseases the following are fully described: Foot disease, bird pox, dry gangrene, chicken pox, “nutritional roup,” aspergillosis, “quail disease,” and tularemia. This brief summary and other references to Stoddard’s (1931) work give a very inadequate idea of the wealth of material that his exhaustive report contains; it must be read to be appreciated; some of the interesting chapters can not even be summarized here.

Winter: In the southern portions of their range, where quail enjoy open winters, their habits and haunts are about the same as during fall; but in the northern regions of ice and snow they have a hard struggle for existence and many perish from hunger and cold in severe winters. Quail have been known to dive into soft snowdrifts for protection from severe cold; Sandys (1904) says he has caught them in such situations. More often, at the approach of a snowstorm, they huddle together in some sheltered spot and let the snow cover them. This gives them good protection from the wind and cold; but if the snow turns to rain, followed by a severe freeze the birds are imprisoned and often perish from hunger before they can escape. Birds seldom freeze to death, if they can get plenty of food, but cold combined with hunger they can not stand. Mr. Forbush (1927) tells an interesting story of a man who had been feeding a covey of quail; for 10 days after a heavy snowstorm, followed by a thaw and freeze, they failed to come to their usual feeding place; believing them to be imprisoned under the snow he went to the place where they were accustomed to sleep and broke the crust; the next day they came to feed and a search showed that they had found the place where he had broken the crust for them.

Quail often find more or less open situations where they get some shelter, under logs or fallen trees, under thick evergreens, in tangles of briers, in brush piles, or under banks with southern exposure; in such places they find bare ground and can pick up some food, as well as the gravel or grit that they need. They avoid open places and do not like to travel on snow, where they are so conspicuous; but they have to go out to forage for food, such as the seeds of weeds, projecting above the snow, rose hips, dried berries, seeds of sumac, bayberries, and other plants. When hard pressed they often visit the barnyard to feed with the poultry. Farmers, sportsmen, boy scouts, and many other persons make a practice of feeding quail regularly in winter. They should have a shelter, made of brush, evergreen boughs, or corn stalks, open at both ends so that the birds can escape at either end. The ground under this should be kept bare and well supplied with almost any kind of grain and plenty of grit. Quail will come regularly to such places and the lives of many will be saved.

Range: Chiefly the Eastern United States, ranging west to eastern Texas, eastern Colorado, and the Dakotas. The great interest shown by sportsmen in the bobwhite has resulted in introductions over the entire country. Though many of these experiments have resulted in failure, others have been notably successful, and in some regions the introduced birds have spread out and met those that are indige nous, thus causing an actual extension of range. The problem is further complicated by the fact that in addition to true virginianue, introductions of so-called Mexican quail (Colinus v. texanu.~) have been made in several States. As these have readily crossed with the native birds, and as individuals show a great deal of variation, it is frequently difficult to determine the natural limits of the different races. The following summary, however, presents a reasonably accurate picture of the natural range of the species:

North to southeastern Wyoming (Horse Shoe Creek); South Dakota (Faulkton) ; North Dakota (Bartlett and Larimore) ; Wisconsin (Danbury and Menominee); Michigan (Douglas Lake and Alcona County) ; southern Ontario (Mount Forest, Listowel, Toronto, and Port Hope) ; Vermont (Londonderry); and Maine (West Gardiner). East to Maine (West Gardiner and West Fryeburg); rarely eastern New Hampshire (Hampton); Massachusetts (Gloucester, Boston, and Cape Cod); Rhode Island (Newport); New York (Shelter Island and Roslyn); New Jersey (Red Bank, Vineland, and Sea Isle City); Delaware (Lincoln); Virginia (Belle Haven, Eastville, Cape Charles, Norfolk, and Dismal Swamp); North Carolina (Currituck Sound and Raleigh); South Carolina (Waverly Mills, St. Helena Island, and Frogmore); Georgia (Savannah, Riceboro, Jekyl Island, and Okefenokee Swamp); and southern Florida (Miami). South to southern Florida (Coconut Grove, Indian Key, and Key West); Alabama (Bon Secour and Mobile); Mississippi (Biloxi and Bay St. Louis); Louisiana (New Orleans, Houma, Abbeville, Mermentau, and Iowa Station); southeastern Texas (Galveston, Corpus Christi. and Brownsville) ; Tamaulipas (Tampico, Altamira, and Victoria) and southern Nuevo Leon (Mier y Noriega). West to Nuevo Leon (Mier y Noriega and Montemorelos); Coahuila (Sabinas); western Texas (Langtry, Lozier, Fort Stockton, and Pecos); probably southeastern New Mexico (Carlsbad) ; eastern Colorado (Monon, Beloit, Yuma, and Crook); and southeastern Wyoming (Uva and Horse Shoe Creek).

Introductions: Introductions have been made in Colorado (Upper Arkansas Valley, Wet Mountains, Pueblo, Denver, Estes Park, Loveland, Fort Collins, Greeley, Saguache, and Grand Junction); Utah (Salt Lake Valley); Montana (Sappington, Anaconda, Flathead Lake, and Kalispell); Idaho (Boise, Nampa, Cocur d’Alene, and Rathdrum); Oregon (Lake Alvord, Snake River Valley, Pendletan, Scio, Dayton, and Portland); Washington (Starbuck, Whidbey Island, Walla Walla, Cheney, Spokane, Osoyoos Lake, Olympia, Tacoma, Seattle, and Blame); and California (San Felipe and Gilroy).

This species also has been transplanted to southwestern Canada (British Columbia and Manitoba) ; the West Indies (Cuba, Jamaica, New Providence, Haiti, Porto Rico, Barbados, St. Kitts, Antigua, St. Croix, and Guadeloupe); New Zealand; England (Norfolk); Sweden; Germany (Hanover); France; and China (Kashing). The introductions in the West Indies (in some instances the Cuban form, C. v. oubanenai~) have been more or less successful, but so far as known all European and Asiatic attempts to acclimatize this bird have been total failures.

The foregoing distribution covers the range of the entire species, which is subdivided into three subspecies. C. v. floridanus occupies the whole of Florida from the vicinity of Gainesville, Palatka, and Tarpon Springs southward. C. v. texanjus occupies central and southern Texas, from southeastern New Mexico to northeastern Mexico. Typical virginianus occupies the rest of the range in Eastern and Central United States.

Egg dates: Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut: 22 records, May 20 to October 10; 11 records, June 5 to July 28. New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania: 18 records, May 21 to August 31; 9 records, June 7 to July 16. Virginia, Kentucky, and Kansas: 18 records, May 14 to September; 9 records, June 2 to July 23. South Carolina and Georgia: 15 records, April 24 to September 16; 8 records, May 21 to June 18. Indiana, Illinois, and Iowa: 31 records, April 28 to October 16; 16 records, June 2 to July 13. Florida (florida’nu8): 46 records, April 19 to July 26; 23 records, May 13 to June 8. Texas (tea~anu8) : 50 records, March 18 to August 19; 25 records, May 11 to June 2.

FLORIDA BOBWHITE  [Current A.O.U. = Northern Bobwhite]


The Florida bird is merely a small, dark variety of the common, northern bobwhite. It is confined entirely to the peninsula of Florida, where it is universally common and generally distributed in all the drier portions of the State, except in the extreme north and the extreme south; in the north it intergrades with the northern form and in the south with the still smaller and darker Cuban form.

If due allowance be made for the different environment in which they live, the Florida birds will be found in similar localities to those chosen by their northern relatives and their habits are essentially the same. Nearly everything I have written about the northern birds applies equally well to the southern. They are equally fond of the society of human beings, where they probably feel more secure from their wild enemies and perhaps find more food. Major Bendire (1892) quotes Doctor Ralph, as saying that “localities they like best are open woods grown up with saw palmettos or low bushes, or fields with woods near them, and they are particularly fond of slovenly cultivated grounds that have bushes and weeds growing thickly along their borders.” I have frequently seen them in small villages, in gardens, and about houses; but I have more often found them in the open flat pine woods where there are extensive patches of saw palmettos; these thick clumps of low palmettos are often almost impenetrable and afford them excellent protection from their enemies.

Nesting: Donald J. Nicholson has sent me the following notes on this subject:

These quail begin to pair off by February, and by March most of them have chosen their mates, but still some will be found In coveys into March. In March the bobwhites begin to think of domestic duties, and the woods and cultivated fields resound with their cheery bob-bob-white. This continues until late June, when the calle become very much less frequent. A few pairs breed as early as March or early April, but the height of the nesting season is late May or early June. They also nest up into August, and one nest was found in December by a hunter, which is quite unusual. From 9 to 16 eggs are laid, which are deposited in arched nests of dead grass, in old fields, in pine woods, or on the edges of grassy ponds. The female does not commence to sit until the last egg is deposited. How long it takes to incabate Is unknown to me. The birds are quite suspicious if a nest is found and will generally leave it, but If not touched sometimes continue their duties. When a nest is found the bird sits until almost trodden upon, then either flies directly off with great speed, or more often flits off and cackles excitedly. running about close by and feigning lameness.

Eggs: The number of eggs laid averages less, but the eggs are quite indistinguishable from those of the northern bird. They are not even appreciably smaller. The measurements of 51 eggs average 30.6 by 23.8 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure 32.6 by 24.1, 31.5 by 24.5, and 28.9 by 22.8 millimeters.

Young: Mr. Nicholson says in his notes:

Both parents attend the young and are very courageous in the defense of the little fellows, running about close to the intruder, Jumping up to attract attention, and uttering strange notes. When the hiding spot of the young is discovered they scurry for other shelter, cheeping as they run, and if pressed too closely will take flight, when very young. I once saw a bobwhite make a mad rush at the wheels of a passing tuto, and after the machine passed the mate also came out. Undoubtedly there were young near by.

Behavior: In general behavior and habits the Florida bird does not differ materially from its northern relative. Its food does not seem to have been separately studied and is included in reports on the species as a whole. It feeds on such of the seeds, fruits, and insects, mentioned in such reports, as are to be found within its range. Its voice is essentially the same. Once exceedixigly abundant in the open country in Florida, it has been greatly reduced in numbers and mainly by its huYnan enemies. It has long been a favorite with sportsmen; its long open season, with little or no protection in many places, has offered them attractive opportunities long after the season in the North has closed. A steadily increasing number of winter visitors have been tempted to spend part of their idle time in hunting, where the shooting is mostly open and the birds easily killed. The quail have shown the effect of this slaughter. They have also suffered greatly from illegal trapping and netting and from shooting out of season, mostly by poor whites and negroes. Fortunately for the future of the Florida bobwhite the laws are now better enforced and there are many large areas where no shooting is allowed and where public sentiment is protecting this and all other desirable birds.



George N. Lawrence (1853) first called attention to the characters that separate the bobwhite of Texas from the two eastern forms. In general appearance it is decidedly grayer than either of the eastern forms. Mr. Lawrence described it more in detail, as follows:

This somewhat resembles 0. virginianus, but is smaller, and differs also In having the lores white, in heing without the conspicuous dark markings on the back and wings, and the bright chestnut red so prevalent in the upper plumage of that species; the bill is proportionately longer and narroxver, the legs more slender, and the black markings on the abdomen and breast are fully twice as broad.

The Texas bobwhite closely resembles the eastern form- in behavior, habits, and haunts. George Finlay Simmons (1925) gives us the following long list of places in which it may be found:

More or less open country, particularly in mesquite-chaparral-cactus pastures; old plantations, clearings, and cultivated fields; open, semi-arid treedotted, bushy pastures in farming country, particularly where such pastures are Interspersed with small bodies of woodland; hay, grain, brown stubble, corn, cotton, and open weedy fields; clearings and brushy edges of woodlands; thickets, brush, and briar patches along edges of meadows and creeks; weedy roadsides and fencerows; wooded hillsides; cedar brakes; cultivated fields. Never In bottom woods or open praries. In fall and winter, among dead stalks in cotton and corn fields.

Nesting: Major Bendire (1892) says:

The favorite nesting site of the Texan Bob White Is a bunch of sedge grass. A slight cavity is made in the center, this is lined with a few straws and arched over with similar material. Sometimes a covered way or tunnel leads to the entrance of the nest. Occasionally a nest is placed under a bush and not covered or arched. Two broods are usually raised in a season, and even three at times.

Mr. Simmons (1925) mentions a number of other nesting sites as follows:

Nest on ground along fencerows, in small dewberry thickets, in prickly-pear beds, in brushy mesquite lands or bushy, grassy pastures, in thick tussocks or clumps of big grass, along weedy fence lines or roadsides, or in the middle of cotton or corn fields on the rolling prairies; usually well hidden by a small bush or by weeds and prairie grasses; occasionally placed in a fencerow with overhanging vines or beside a stone wall or a log.

Eggs: The eggs of the Texas bobwhite are indistinguishable from those of the eastern bird. From 10 to 15 eggs constitute the usual set, but 18 or 19 are occasionally laid, and Bendire (1892) states that H. P. Attwater once found 33 eggs in a nest. Probably this large set was the product of two females. According to Bendire (1892), “two broods are usually raised in a season, and even three at times.” The measurements of 59 eggs, in the United States National Museum, average 30 by 24 millimeters; the eggs showing the four extremes measure 32 by 25, 30 by 25.5, and 27.5 by 22 millimeters.

Plumages: The molts and plumages correspond to those of the eastern bobwhite, but Dr. Jonathan Dwight (1900) says that “the juvenal plumage is browner than in virginianua.”

Food: Mrs. Florence Merriam Bailey (1928) writes:

The Bob White is of special agricultural value because It destroys a large amount of weed seed and a considerable number of insects. Half of its food Is weed seed, only a fourth grain: mainly from the stubble fields: and about a tenth wild fruits. Fifteen per cent is composed of insects, including several of the most serious pests of agriculture. It feeds freely upon Colorado potato beetles and chinch bugs, and eats also grasshoppers, cucumber beetles, wireworms, blilbugs, clover-leaf weevils, the Mexican cotton-boll weevils, army worms, cotton worms, cutworms, and Rocky Mountain locusts.

Behavior: Mr. Simmons (1925) says:

Observed singly, in pairs in summer, or by threes and fours; in winter, from middle fall to early spring, In coveys or bevies of from 10 to 30, breaking up for the breeding season and reassembling as soon as It is over. Rather shy and difficult to find after the hunting season has opened. During summer days the birds seek shelter under the bushes which dot the pastures; winter days, In scattered brush heaps and tiny hollows. On spring and summer nights they generally roost In the open fields; on fall and winter nights, roost under cover, usually in lowlands. When frightened, or when preparing to sleep and keep warm, a covey arranges Itself In a close-huddled circle, heads out from center; when approach is too close, the birds burst In all directions, making it very dimeult to shoot more than one at a time; were they to follow each other, as most gregarious birds do, the hunter would have a better opportunity to exterminate the whole covey. Occasionally, but rarely, takes to the trees when flushed, and remains squatting close to limb and practically invisible.

Voice: The Texas bobwhite has a range of varied calls similar to those of its eastern relative, but the notes are said to be less loud, clear, and ringing.

Enemies: Major Bendire (1892) quotes William Lloyd, as follows:

They are very insuspicious, and their low notes, uttered while feeding, attract a good many enemies. I have seen foxes on the watch, and the Marsh Harrier perched on a clump of grass on the lookout, waiting for them to pass. But the many large rattlesnakes found here are their worst enemies. One killed in May had swallowed five of these birds at one meal; another, a female evidently caught on her nest and a half dozen of her eggs; a third, four Bob Whites and a Scaled Partridge. The young are also greatly affected and many killed by heavy rains in June and July; numbers perish then from cold and protracted wet weather. When alarmed by a Hawk sailing overhead they run under the mother for protection, as domestic chickens do.



This well-marked species once inhabited a narrow strip of country in southern Arizona, where its range extended for not more than 40 or 50 miles north of the Mexican boundary. It has long since been exterminated in Arizona and has now perhaps disappeared entirely from its more extensive range in Sonora. Herbert Brown was the first to discover the presence of this quail in Arizona, and we are indebted to him for practically all we know of its former distribution and habits. He first met the bird in Sonora, hearing its note and supposing it to be our eastern bobwhite. He says of this incident (1904):

It Is not easy to describe the feelings of myself and American companions when we first heard the call bob white. It was startling and unexpected, and that night nearly every man in camp had some reminiscence to tell of Bob White and his boyhood days. Just that simple call made many a hardy man heartsick and homesick. It was to us Americans the one homelike thing in all Sonora, and we felt thousands of miles nearer to our dear old homes in the then far distant States.

In the spring of 1884 a pair of these quail was taken on the eastern slope of the Baboquivari Mountains, Arizona, and brought to Brown as specimens; but because of his absence they were allowed to spoil and were thrown away. Meantime he had reported to a local paper that a pair of bobwhite quail had been taken in Arizona, and the note was republished in Forest and Stream. This aroused the interest of Robert Ridgway, to whom fragments of the two birds were sent for identification. He pronounced them Ort~’a, (Colinu~) graysoni, a Mexican species.

During that same year Frank Stephens collected in Sonora, Mexico, a male masked bobwhite for William Brewster, which was described by Mr. Brewster (1885) as the type of a new species, which he named CoZinus ridgwayi. This whole interesting history is given in more detail, with reference to several published articles on the subject, in an excellent paper by Dr. J. A. Allen (1886), to which the reader is referred.

Brown (1904) was told that “in early days they were plentiful in Ramsey’s Canyon in the Huachucas, and also on the Babacomori, a valley intervening between the Huachuca and Harahaw ranges.” Speaking of conditions prior to 1870, he says:

At that time the valley was heavily grassed and the Apache Indians notoriously bad, a combination that prevented the most sanguine naturalist from getting too close to the ground without taking big chances of permanently supping under It. For many years Indians, grass, and birds have been gone. The Santa Cruz, to the south and ~vest of the Sonoite, is wider and was more heavily brushed. Those conditions gave the birds a better chance for life and for years they held tenaciously on. Six or seven years ago I was told by a ranchman living near Calabasas, that a small bunch of Bob-white Quail bad shortly before entered his barnyard and that he had killed six of them at one shot. It was a grievous thing to do, hut the man did not know that he was wiping out of existence the last remnant of a native Arizona game bird. Later I heard of the remaining few having been occasionally seen, but for several years now no word has come of them.

I never found them west of the Baboquivari Mountains, and from my knowledge of the country thereabouts I am inclined to fix. the eastern slope of that range as their western limit. Between that and Itamsey’s Cafion, in the Huachucas, is a distance of nearly one hundred miles. Their deepest point of penetration into the Territory was probably not more than fifty miles, and that was down the Baboquivari or Altar valley.

As to the causes of the bird’s disappearance, he writes: The causes leading to the extermination of the Arizona Masked Bob-white (Colinus ridgwa~d) are due to the overstocking of the country with cattle, supplemented by several rainless years. This combination practically stripped the country bare of vegetation. Of their range the ColinU8 occupied only certain restricted portions, and when their food and shelter had been trodden out of existence by thousands of hunger-dying stock, there was nothing left for poor little Bob-white to do but go out with them. As the conditions in Sonora were similar to those in Arizona, birds and cattle suffered In common. The Arizona Bob-white would have thriven well in an agricultural country, in brushy fence corners, tangled thickets and weed-covered fields, but such things were not to be had In their habitat. Unless a few can still be found on the upper Santa Crus we can, in truth, bid them a final good-bye.

Nesting: Very little is known about the nesting habits of the masked bobwhite. Brown (1904) offered a reward of $1 an egg for the first nest found for him. A nest containing six eggs was found on the mesa on the eastern side of the Baboquivari Mountains. “Unfortunately these precious things were lost through the cupidity of the finders, whose expectations ran to more eggs, but while waiting for the increase the nest was robbed of the eggs that were then in it. I was, however, notified of the find, but when I reached there I found only an empty nest, a bowl-shaped depression in a bunch of mountain grass.”

Major Bendire (1892) quotes from a letter received from Otho C. Poling, relating his fruitless attempt to find a nest and reporting the finding of an egg in the oviduct of a female, which he shot on May 24, 1890.

Col. John E. Thayer has a set of seven eggs in his collection, presented to him by Miss Engel, of Cleveland, Ohio. It was collected in Sonora, Mexico, on May 4, 1908. The nest was “placed in sand under a bunch of dry grass.” The female was closely observed, but as the females of this and some other Mexican species are practically indistinguishable, there may be some doubt about the identification.

Eggs: The eggs of the masked bobwhite are indistinguishable from those of the eastern bobwhite. The single egg in the United States National Museum is pure white and unstained, as it was taken from the oviduct of a bird by Herbert Brown. This egg measures 32.5 by 25 millimeters. The egg recorded by Major Bendire, possibly the Poling egg, measured 81 by 24 millimeters; I do not know just what has become of this egg, or how Major Bendire got the measurements.

Colonel Thayer’s eggs are slightly smaller; they average 29.6 by 23.4 millimeters; the largest egg measures 30J by 23.6 and the smallest 28.3 by 23.1 millimeters.

Plumages: The downy young of the masked bobwhite is unknown. In the juvenal plumage, which is worn for only a short time in summer and early in fall, the sexes are alike and closely resemble the similar stage in the Texas bobwhite. Doctor Allen (1889) describes a young male, taken on October 10 and still partly in first plumage, as follows.

The top of the head is blackish, with each feather narrowly bordered with ashy brown. The hind neck, sides of the neck, and jugulum are yellowish white, with each feather barred at the tip with black. The scapulars are brownish, each feather with a rather broad whitish shaft stripe, and barred with yellowish white and black, and the wing coverts have much the same pattern, hut the barring is pale cinnamon and brown. The throat is pure white, with new black feathers appearing irregularly along the sides of the chin and upper throat. Breast pale brown, with light shaft stripes and faintly barred with blackish, passing into brownish white with more distinct bars on the upper abdomen. The new feathers along the sides of the breast and flanks are chestnut, tipped with a spot of clear white, which is bordered behind with a more or less V-shaped bar of deep black. The broad yellowish white superciliary stripes extend to the nostrils.

The sexes differentiate during the fall, and young males show continuous progress toward maturity during their first winter. The juvenal plumage does not wholly disappear until December or later; there is more or Less white in the black throat and more or less black barring on the breast; but the throat becomes clearer black and the breast and underparts purer ” tawny “as the season advances.

Food: Major Bendire (1892) quotes Brown on this subject, as follows:

Of three stomachs of this species examined, one contained a species of mustard seed, a few chaparral berries, and some six or eight beetles and other insects, ranging in length from a half inch down to the size of a pin head. The second was similarly provided, but contained, in lieu of mustard seed, a grasshopper fully an inch in length. These two were taken on the mesa. The third, from a bird taken In the valley, contained about 20 medium-sized red ants, several crescent-shaped seeds, and a large number of small, fleshy, green leaves.

He also says that Lieut. H. C. Benson, who secured a number of specimens in Sonora, in 1886, wrote him “that they only frequented cultivated fields there, whete wheat and barley had been raised.” John 0. Cahoon, who collected in the same section of Sonora, found these quail abundant there; “several large coveys were seen and 8 specimens shot in one day “; he sent 10 specimens, taken February 5: 8, 1887, to William Brewster (1887); they were “haunting patches of weeds in gardens and barren sand wastes, where they fed on the seeds of a plant called red-root.”

Behavior: Brown (1885) says of the habits of the masked bobwhite:

They appear to resemble very ciose~y those of the common quail (0. virDiniatttsa), only slightly modified by the conditions of their envirorment. They utter the characteristic call, “Bob White,” with bold, full notes, and perch on rocks and bushes when calling. They do not appear to be at all a mountain bird, but live on the mesa, in the valleys, and possibly in the foothills ‘ * In addition to their ‘ Bob White~’ they have a second cafl of iwo-we, articulated and as clean cut as their Bob White. This call of iwo-we they use when scattered, and more especially do they use it when separated toward nightfall. At this hour I noted that, although they occasionally called “Bob White” they never repeated the first syllable, as in the daytime they now and then attempted to do * * I will venture to say that when frightened and scattered they are a hard bird to get. Hear one call, locate It as you may, see one fly and mark it down, and without a dog it is virtually impossible to flush It.

Gri¶ng Bancroft wrote to me in 1928, as follows:

The masked bobwhite, CoZinus ridgwayi, is virtually extinct. Its former breeding range was confined to a tranaition zone somewhat oval in shape and lying at an elevation of 3,500 to 4,000 feet and over. The western axial center is situated in Sonora, about 20 miles due south of Nogales. The city of Magdalena appears to mark the southern boundary, while the northern line lies about halfway between Tucson and Nogales. The western swing of the circle naturally is broken and irregular; nevertheless it can be traced quite clearly, as the land falls In every direction but east. As soon as desert conditions begin to intergrade with grass and oak, environments no longer seem favorable for the masked bobwhite.

The eastern limits of the bird’s range are also determined by altitude. Just where the mountains begin to get too high for them it is hard to say, though it is not very far east of Nogales. I believe it is about 50 mIles and feel quite confident it is not more than 100, though I have not traced that line personally as I have the other.

There have been seen within the past two years two small bands of these quail north and west of Magdalena. Except for this no hunter, sportsman, or observer with whom I have been able to establish contacts has ever seen the bird or heard of its existence. As my inquiries have been carried on for the past six years and have covered a large stretch of country and been thorough, my conclusion that the bird is almost extinct does not seem open to question. The reasons for his disappearance are not so clear. The greatest contributing cause appears to be the habit the Mexican wood cutters have of burning the hillsides in order to get better firewood. The rise In the cattle industry, In the prosperity and population of the country, and civillzatloa in general seems to have wiped out the bbbwhite and the turkeys, but not Gambel’s or Mearns’s quail. CoUnus riefrjwayi can not maintain itself against civilization. The reasons why it can not (10 so are not wholly obvious.

Range: Formerly north to southern Arizona (Baboquivari Mountains and Huachuca Mountains). South to northern Sonora (Sesabe and Magdalena). The eastern and western limits determined by the extent of grassy plains at altitudes of from 3,500 to 4,000 feet. This bobwhite has now disappeared entirely from Arizona and is nearly, or quite, extinct in Sonora.

Egg dates: Arizona: 3 records, May 4 to 12.

About the Author

Sam Crowe

Sam is the founder of He has been birding for over 30 years and has a world list of over 2000 species. He has served as treasurer of the Texas Ornithological Society, Sanctuary Chair of Dallas Audubon, Editor of the Cornell Lab of Ornithology's "All About Birds" web site and as a contributing editor for Birding Business magazine. Many of his photographs and videos can be found on the site.

Let others know your thoughts or ask an expert

Would you like to get new articles of birds (Once a month?)

No SPAM! We might only send you fresh updates once a month

Thank you for subscribing!

No thanks! I prefer to follow BirdZilla on Facebook